Comparative Characterisation of Seven Interlayer Materials
The Seven Interlayers
Centelles et al. (2021) tested seven commercial interlayer materials under identical conditions, enabling direct comparison. All specimens were standalone interlayer films tested in an RSA3 DMA (TA Instruments) in tension mode, at temperatures from −10°C to 50°C (extended to 80°C for SentryGlas).
| Material | Type | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| EVALAM | EVA | Folienwerk Wolfen |
| EVASAFE | EVA | Bridgestone |
| PVB BG-R20 | Standard PVB | Trosifol (Kuraray) |
| Saflex DG-41 | Stiff PVB | Saflex (Eastman) |
| PVB ES | Structural PVB | Trosifol (Kuraray) |
| SentryGlas | Ionomer | Kuraray |
| TPU | Thermoplastic polyurethane | — |
Three Distinct Behavioural Groups
The isothermal relaxation curves reveal three fundamentally different types of viscoelastic behaviour:
Group 1: PVB materials (BG-R20, DG-41, ES)
Extreme temperature sensitivity in the 0–40°C range. E(t) at 1 s ranges from ~1000 MPa at −10°C to ~0.5 MPa at 50°C — a 2000× drop across 60°C. Strong time dependence (significant relaxation at each temperature). Tg near +8°C places the glass transition right in the structural service temperature range.
Group 2: SentryGlas (ionomer)
Moderate temperature sensitivity up to 50°C. E(t) remains ~100–700 MPa across the design range because Tg ≈ 55°C is above most service temperatures. Only at 60–80°C does significant softening occur. Retains E∞ = 80.5 MPa — meaningful long-term structural stiffness due to ionic cross-links.
Group 3: EVA and TPU
Low temperature sensitivity across the entire range. E(t) ≈ 2–14 MPa at all service temperatures (Tg < −10°C — already in rubbery plateau). Very little time dependence — nearly elastic. TPU is approximately 2× stiffer than EVASAFE at all temperatures. EVA shows a secondary crystallisation anomaly near 44°C.
Master Curve Comparison
The TTS-shifted master curves at T0 = 20°C reveal the full relaxation behaviour:
- PVB group: classic S-shaped curve from glassy plateau (~1000 MPa) to rubbery plateau (~0.5–2 MPa) over 6–8 decades of log(t). PVB ES and Saflex DG-41 are nearly indistinguishable.
- SentryGlas: S-shape shifted to much longer reduced times. Maintains high modulus to timescales where PVB has already reached its rubbery plateau.
- EVA/TPU: nearly flat master curves — E0 and E∞ differ by less than 10×.
The stiffness crossover
At short times (wind gust, 3 s): PVB ES ≈ Saflex DG-41 > PVB BG-R20 ≈ SentryGlas >> TPU > EVA.
At long times (permanent load, 50 years): SentryGlas >> PVB ES > Saflex DG-41 >> PVB BG-R20 >> TPU > EVA.
The key insight: SentryGlas ranks below PVB for short loads but far above PVB for sustained loads.
Damping: tan(δ) Peak Values
| Material | tan(δ) peak | log ω at peak (rad/s) | Character |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVB BG-R20 | 1.28 | 1.27 | Highest damping — best acoustic interlayer |
| Saflex DG-41 | 0.80 | 0.40 | High damping (stiff PVB) |
| PVB ES | 0.72 | 0.35 | High damping (structural PVB) |
| SentryGlas | 0.65 | −2.16 | Peak at very low frequency (long timescale) |
| EVALAM | 0.11 | −0.55 | Low damping (already rubbery) |
| EVASAFE | 0.09 | −0.76 | Lowest measured damping |
| TPU | 0.08 | 1.92 | Very low damping |
Prony Coefficients Compared
| Material | E0 (MPa) | E∞ (MPa) | E0/E∞ | C1 | C2 (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVALAM | 2.75 | 0.344 | 8× | 8.99 | 92.8 |
| EVASAFE | 5.48 | 0.637 | 9× | 13.2 | 133.8 |
| PVB BG-R20 | 978 | 0.476 | 2054× | 14.7 | 88.0 |
| Saflex DG-41 | 1156 | 1.16 | 997× | 17.5 | 110.2 |
| PVB ES | 1193 | 1.79 | 667× | 20.2 | 125.1 |
| SentryGlas | 684 | 80.5 | 8.5× | 102.3 | 604.5 |
| TPU | 13.9 | 3.38 | 4.1× | 15.8 | 196.7 |
The E0/E∞ ratio is the clearest single indicator of material character. PVB BG-R20 drops 2054×: from rigid glass-like to near-fluid under sustained load at 20°C. SentryGlas drops only 8.5×, retaining 80 MPa — a structurally meaningful modulus.
Key Finding: PVB ES ≈ Saflex DG-41
One of the most significant practical findings: PVB ES (Trosifol/Kuraray) and Saflex DG-41 (Eastman) — stiff PVB products from different manufacturers — have very similar viscoelastic properties. Their master curves nearly overlap, and their Prony coefficients give comparable results (E∞ = 1.79 vs 1.16 MPa; C1 = 20.2 vs 17.5).
This means engineers can treat these products as structurally interchangeable for design purposes, simplifying specification and sourcing.
Choosing the Right Interlayer
| Application | Governing criterion | Best interlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Safety glazing (standard) | Impact retention, cost | PVB BG-R20 |
| Acoustic glazing | Maximum damping (tanδ) | PVB BG-R20 (tanδ = 1.28) |
| Structural glazing (moderate) | Short-term stiffness | PVB ES or Saflex DG-41 |
| Structural glazing (demanding) | Sustained load capacity | SentryGlas (E∞ = 80.5 MPa) |
| Balustrades, canopies, floors | Post-breakage + sustained load | SentryGlas |
| BIPV / decorative | Optical clarity, flexibility | EVA (EVALAM or EVASAFE) |
| Security glazing | Tear resistance, adhesion | TPU |
Compare Materials in Detail
Our database includes full relaxation curves for all interlayer types. Select any material, see G at all EN 16613 conditions, and generate Prony coefficients.
Launch Prony Calculator